Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Beban Kerja, Disiplin Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kantor Camat Tebing Tinggi Kabupaten Empat Lawang

Authors

  •  Deri Saputra  Program Pascasarjana Unsela
  •  Marko Ilpiyanto  Program Pascasarjana Unsela
  •  Nisma Aprini  Program Pascasarjana Unsela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61930/jebmak.v3i3.812

Keywords:

Work Environment, Work Load, Work Discipline, Work Motivation, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the influence of the work environment, workload, work discipline and work motivation on employee performance at the Tebing Tinggi District Office, Empat Lawang Regency. The method used in this study is a quantitative method with several tests, namely validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests and hypothesis tests (t-test, f-test, coefficient of determination). Based on the results of primary data regression processed using SPSS 24, the following multiple linear regression equations are obtained: Y = 7.411 + 0.239 X1+ 0.201 X2+ 0.266 X3+0.743 X4 + e. Partially, the Work Environment Variable ( X 1 ) has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance due to the significance value of the variable X 1 0.009 which is less than

0.05 then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, The Workload variable ( X2 ) shows a positive and significant influence on Employee Performance. Because the significance value of the variable X2 is

0.016 which is smaller than 0.05, then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The Work Discipline variable ( X3 ) has a positive and significant influence on Employee Performance, because the significance value of the variable X3 is 0.004 which is smaller than 0.05 , then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The Work Motivation variable ( X4 ) has a positive and significant influence on Employee Performance, because the significance value of the variable X4 is 0.000 which is smaller than 0.05, then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. Simultaneously, the four Independent variables ( Work Environment, Workload, Work Discipline and Work Motivation ) together have a significant influence on Employee Performance with an F value of 22.632 and a significance of .000. The determination coefficient R2 of 0.673 or 67.3% states that the influence of the work environment (X1 ) , workload (X2) , work discipline (X3 ) and work motivation (X4 ) together on the employee performance variable (Y) is 67.3% while the remaining 32.7% is influenced by other variables not included in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfiah, D. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Tetap. Semarang.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi Revisi 6. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Davis. (2002). Pengaruh Motivasi, Disiplin dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Kesehatan Kota Cimahi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journ al), 7(2).

Fahmi, I. (2011). Manajemen (teori, kasus, dan solusi), Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ferdinand, A. (2013). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Badan PenerbitUndip.

Ghozali. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Handoko, T. (2003). Manajemen, Edisi Kedua, yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hasibuan, dkk. (2016), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Hasibuan, M. S. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Bumi

Akasara.

Miftahul K. J. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Supervisor Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Volume 16 Nomor1.

Murti, (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Kompensasi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Guru SMP Negeri (Studi Kasus di SMP Negri 5 Sragen), Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Program Studi Akuntansi, Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta

Nirman N. M. (2017). Pengaruh Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Kota Makassar. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Makasar.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kesehatan edisi revisi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Pambudi, Y.W. (2017). Analisis Beban Kerja Karyawan Dengan Metode Full Time Equivalent (Studi Kasus UKM Unlogic Projeck). Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta.Satrianegara, dkk. (2009). Buku Ajar Organisasi Dan Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan Serta Kebidanan, Jakarta: Salemba Medika.

Sedarmayanti. (2001). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: Mandar Maju. Sedarmayanti. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen

Pegawai Negeri Sipil, Cetakan Kelima, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Sidanti, dkk. (2015), Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Disiplin Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Sekretariat DPRD Kabupaten Madiun, Jurnal JIBEKA, Vol. 9, No. 1, 44-53

Sitepu. (2013). Beban Kerja dan Motivasi Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT. Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk Cabang Manado. Vol.1, No.4, ISSN: 2303-1174.

Sri R, dkk. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Kompensasi Dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Pt. Pisma Garment Demak Jawa Tengah).

Sudarmanto. (2014). Kinerja dan Pengembangan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia.

Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar

Sugiyono. (2016) Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sunyoto. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Buku Seru.

Syahza, dkk. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian, UR Press, Riau.

Zonyfar, dkk. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian, CV. Pena Persada, Banyumas.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Deri Saputra, Marko Ilpiyanto, & Nisma Aprini. (2024). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja, Beban Kerja, Disiplin Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kantor Camat Tebing Tinggi Kabupaten Empat Lawang. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 771–792. https://doi.org/10.61930/jebmak.v3i3.812

Most read articles by the same author(s)